It is not only Hari Singh Nalwa but also Maharaja Ranjit Singh who never got due respect.

Afghans had ruled India except for the Mughal period. Mohmed Ghouri, Sher Shah Suri and Ibrahim Lodi conqured and ruled India. Babar had defeated Ibrahim Lodi, an Afghan in the first bettle of Panipat in 1526 to start Mughal dynasty. Later, Nadir Shah ( Iranian/Afghan) and Ahmed Shah Abdali defeated Mughals and in case Of Abdali also Marathas in the third battle of Panipat.

Traditional border between India and Afghanistan was Indus river. Maharaja Ranjit Singh consolidated Sikh Misls into a Sikh empire and spent 40 years ejecting Afghans out of Punjab. He pushed the border to the other side of Khyber Pass. Hari Singh Nalwa was the general who led the charge. Kashmir, Peshawar, Gilgit and many other areas of NW Punjab were all wrested away from Afghans. He sealed the Khyber Pass as the invasion route to India.

It was the English who enjoyed the fruits of Hari Singh’s and Ranjit Singh’s labor

The Jawaharlal Nehru’s speech on the August 14, 1947 celebrating India’s freedom has to be one of the grandest speeches of all time. He had put in inspriring words the aspirations of all Indians. He probably set impossible goals but they were universally approved.

It is easy to trash Nehru now. But it is hard to underestimate his achievments. India did adopt a constitution, did hold elections on time, did let the federal structure take hold. It was only one of the newly independent countries that did not end up wit a strong man rule.

He nurtured the constitutional institutions, especially the parliament. He not only talked in lofty terms about the temples of new India but helped build them. IHis emphasis on Sceinctific temper begot us IITs, IIMs, Research labs, TIFR, AEC, ISRO, and various other institutes of higher learning.

In retrospect his economic policies turn out to not so great. Five year plans were misguided. Adoption of socialism turned a nation of natural entrepreneurs into a beaurocratic morras. His foreign policy, of talikg loudly while carrying a small stick also turned out to be not so great.

But on a whole, he laid the foundations of a strong cohesive nation with reasonably strong institutions. India did congeal into a cohesive nation under him.

I guess only time will tell what the current disposition will achieve but I am glad it was Nehru at the time of independence who took the helm.

It frustrates me to see a generation of Indians being raised on alternate facts about Mahatma Gandhi and his role in the Indian Freedom movement.

Mahatma, a sobriquet given to him by Tagore, was by no means a perfect human being. His Experiments with Truths were strange in many respects. His neglect of his wife and children are well documented.

But he did come with novel tools that turned India’s freedom movement to a mass, all India, movement. He went from being a properly dressed brown Englishman to a half naked Faqir to identify with ordinary Indians. He changed a political movement to a moral/legal movement and changed the nature of discussion.

Emphasis on non-violence was brilliant. Civil-disobedince was a new techniqure against force was very ineffective. Filling up jails voluntrily made the unjust criminal justice system totally useless.

His techniques tugged at the heart of ordinary people in England who had no idea about unjust and illegal nature of the their Raj in India.

His techniques have proven efficacious for American Negoes in his fight for justice and fight against apartheid in South Africa.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/world/asia/us-china-consulate.html

No country benefitted more than China from the liberal world order architected by America. No coutry got more trade help and investments from America than China. Deng Xioping had given the sage advice to Chinese leadership. Hide your strength; don’t rock the boat. Advice was well taken by Jiang Zemin who harped on “peaceful rise” of China to put every body at ease. It was a fast rising economic and military power and was on its way to overtake America, with the help of America, in almost every respect in not too distant future. As a matter of fact, rise of China appeared to come at the expense of America, whose decline was starting to become apparent.
So it is hard to fathom why China decided to thumb its nose at Amerca. Xi JinPing from the getgo decided to throw the caution to the wind. It immediately challenged US ally Japan in the East China Sea. Then it made a spurious claim on all of the South China Sea. It decided to spurn the International Court ruling that China’s claim on Islands off the coast of Phillipines was untenable. It upended a 27 year old agreement with India and started a bloody skirmish on the border, forgetting India is a nuclear power. It violated its 23 year old treaty with UK about Hong Kong. Why was all this necessary when a simple strategy of staying the course would have put China on the top in about a decade or so?
Now US is aroused. India has lost all its illusions about China. Australia, UK and Japan are getting ready to join forces with US and India to challenge Chinese plans of hegemony. I think a point of no return has been reached. Cold war is underway. China does have friends in Pakistan and North Korea, and may be Russia. Last cold war lasted 40 years and had provided US a sharp focus and a sense of purpose. I think this cold war is likely to do the same thing