Streamlining to run efficiently the state run enterprises is an oxymoronic idea. It is just not possible. Incentives are just not there, no body is going to get richer if the company is more profitable, as the stock is not listed where investors can reward the managers of a well run company. The state run enterprises, atleast in India are there to provide patronage by the politicians and bureaocrats and also also are a source of perks for them.

Time to privatize them or shut them down. Why does India need Air India? Its capacity to suffer infinite losses and still be able to fly is putting pressures on other players in the industry. Why does government need to run any business?

Like we used to say at IIT, fundas are just not clear!

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/central-public-sector-enterprises-to-merge-or-list-subsidiaries/articleshow/69816815.cms

My older brother Tony has a treasure trove of family memorabalia. This is a photo of mine he recently shared. It was taken at the time I was applying for IIT in 1963.

No alternative text description for this image

Startup India is a flagship initiative of the Modi Sarkar. It should give confidence that government is serious about this. But I am afraid it is blowing it. It totally babufied (bureacratized) the initiative and mucked with the market and played favorites. It celebrates the the totally silly “Unicorns”.

It is time to get serious here. India can’t afford to miss this boat too. Next one may be long time coming.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/newsbuzz/startups-waiting-for-regulatory-relief/articleshow/73207550.cms

With WeWork, UBER and Lyft fiascos, people are starting to wonder what is going on. Here is my assessment…

In the beginning, there were founders, angels and VCs. Their job was to create a robust fast growing and a profitable company with proven markets. They needed more capital than the VCs could provide to scale up the company. There was also a need to provide liquidity to early players and establish a market value of the company. Hence, an IPO!

Underwriters were needed for an IPO to firmly underwrite an offering. They assessed the market and came up with a market price that they could get behind . They created the demand and built the book of customers.Stocks were then floated at a price which satisfied only half of the demand so there will be demand if somebody flipped the shares. Underwrites were required to stablize the market by stepping in if there was no demand and price started to sink.

I saw this process first hand and it worked like a charm. All this was great as the company’s had a lot of growing to do and a lot of value creation was still to be done. Public investors expected to see a rapid value creation and stock appreciation.

Then came the massively funded Unicorns. They took all the available VC money, then took the wall street money to fund further and they sold in the secondary markets to individuals. The price of the stock had no real meaning as the late stage deals were highly structured and had huge downside protection.

Companies are not proven and are still incurring huge losses. Founders and employees have already been cashed out and are living the rich life. The fire in the belly is extinguished. No more money is available from current investors so stock has to be foisted on the unsuspecting public!

How do you sell such a stock in an IPO? Current and future value is unknown and is very dubious. Stock is already widely held and there are really no buyers left in the market; everybody is waiting to sell!

Is it a fault of Wall Street bankers? VCs? Founders?